Depth pruning improves the inference efficiency of large language models by removing Transformer blocks. Prior work typically treats layer redundancy as an inherent structural property of pretrained networks, emphasizing importance criteria and search algorithms to identify removable layers. In this study, we empirically investigate depth pruning from a functional perspective. Evaluating representative LLM families across diverse calibration configurations and multiple search algorithms, we show that different configurations produce different pruning patterns. Furthermore, under a fixed calibration configuration, complex search algorithms yield marginal performance improvements over simple one-shot methods, converging to similar pruned subsets. Overall, our results suggest that the calibration configuration plays a substantially larger role than the choice of search algorithm in shaping pruning patterns and calibration perplexity, while contributing comparably to variance in downstream reasoning accuracy. This indicates that future pruning efforts may benefit from prioritizing the calibration configuration over search complexity.
@article{arxiv.2604.24938,
title = {Rethinking Layer Redundancy: Calibration Matters More Than Search in LLM Depth Pruning},
author = {Minkyu Kim and Vincent-Daniel Yun and Youngrae Kim and Suin Cho and Woosang Lim and Sunwoo Lee},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.24938},
year = {2026}
}