English

Results from the Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST)

Nuclear Experiment 2022-06-22 v2 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

The Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST) was designed to investigate the deficit of electron neutrinos, νe\nu_{e}, observed in previous gallium-based radiochemical measurements with high-intensity neutrino sources, commonly referred to as the \textit{gallium anomaly}, which could be interpreted as evidence for oscillations between νe\nu_e and sterile neutrino (νs\nu_s) states. A 3.414-MCi \nuc{51}{Cr} νe\nu_e source was placed at the center of two nested Ga volumes and measurements were made of the production of \nuc{71}{Ge} through the charged current reaction, \nuc{71}{Ga}(νe\nu_e,e^-)\nuc{71}{Ge}, at two average distances. The measured production rates for the inner and the outer targets respectively are (54.92.4+2.5(\mboxstat)±1.4(\mboxsyst)54.9^{+2.5}_{-2.4}(\mbox{stat})\pm1.4 (\mbox{syst})) and (55.62.6+2.7(\mboxstat)±1.4(\mboxsyst)55.6^{+2.7}_{-2.6}(\mbox{stat})\pm1.4 (\mbox{syst})) atoms of \nuc{71}{Ge}/d. The ratio (RR) of the measured rate of \nuc{71}{Ge} production at each distance to the expected rate from the known cross section and experimental efficiencies are Rin=0.79±0.05R_{in}=0.79\pm0.05 and Rout=0.77±0.05R_{out}= 0.77\pm0.05. The ratio of the outer to the inner result is 0.97±\pm0.07, which is consistent with unity within uncertainty. The rates at each distance were found to be similar, but 20-24\% lower than expected, thus reaffirming the anomaly. These results are consistent with νeνs\nu_e \rightarrow \nu_s oscillations with a relatively large Δm2\Delta m^2 (>>0.5 eV2^2) and mixing sin22θ^2 2\theta (\approx0.4).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2109.11482,
  title  = {Results from the Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST)},
  author = {V. V. Barinov and B. T. Cleveland and S. N. Danshin and H. Ejiri and S. R. Elliott and D. Frekers and V. N. Gavrin and V. V. Gorbachev and D. S. Gorbunov and W. C. Haxton and T. V. Ibragimova and I. Kim and Yu. P. Kozlova and L. V. Kravchuk and V. V. Kuzminov and B. K. Lubsandorzhiev and Yu. M. Malyshkin and R. Massarczyk and V. A. Matveev and I. N. Mirmov and J. S. Nico and A. L. Petelin and R. G. H. Robertson and D. Sinclair and A. A. Shikhin and V. A. Tarasov and G. V. Trubnikov and E. P. Veretenkin and J. F. Wilkerson and A. I. Zvir},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.11482},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

Paper updated to final version