English

Resolution of The Linear-Bounded Automata Question

Computational Complexity 2025-05-27 v22 Formal Languages and Automata Theory

Abstract

This paper resolves a famous and longstanding open question in automata theory, i.e., the {\it linear-bounded automata question} (or shortly, LBA question), which can also be phrased succinctly in the language of computational complexity theory as NSPACE[n]=?DSPACE[n]. {\rm NSPACE}[n]\overset{?}{=}{\rm DSPACE}[n]. In fact, we prove a more general result that DSPACE[S(n)]NSPACE[S(n)] {\rm DSPACE}[S(n)]\subsetneqq {\rm NSPACE}[S(n)] where S(n)nS(n)\geq n is a space-constructible function. Our proof technique is based on diagonalization against deterministic S(n)S(n) space-bounded Turing machines with a universal nondeterministic Turing machine and on other novel and interesting new techniques. Our proof also implies the following consequences, which resolve some famous open questions in complexity theory: (1). DSPACE[n]NSPACE[n]{\rm DSPACE}[n]\subsetneqq {\rm NSPACE}[n]; (2). LNLL\subsetneqq NL; (3). LPL\subsetneqq P; (4). There exists no deterministic Turing machine working in O(logn)O(\log n) space deciding the stst-connectivity question (STCON).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2110.05942,
  title  = {Resolution of The Linear-Bounded Automata Question},
  author = {Tianrong Lin},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05942},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

[v22] grammatical mistakes corrected; some references further added; we wish you will enjoy this work

R2 v1 2026-06-24T06:49:25.497Z