English

Representing Formal Languages: A Comparison Between Finite Automata and Recurrent Neural Networks

Machine Learning 2019-02-28 v1 Formal Languages and Automata Theory

Abstract

We investigate the internal representations that a recurrent neural network (RNN) uses while learning to recognize a regular formal language. Specifically, we train a RNN on positive and negative examples from a regular language, and ask if there is a simple decoding function that maps states of this RNN to states of the minimal deterministic finite automaton (MDFA) for the language. Our experiments show that such a decoding function indeed exists, and that it maps states of the RNN not to MDFA states, but to states of an {\em abstraction} obtained by clustering small sets of MDFA states into "superstates". A qualitative analysis reveals that the abstraction often has a simple interpretation. Overall, the results suggest a strong structural relationship between internal representations used by RNNs and finite automata, and explain the well-known ability of RNNs to recognize formal grammatical structure.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1902.10297,
  title  = {Representing Formal Languages: A Comparison Between Finite Automata and Recurrent Neural Networks},
  author = {Joshua J. Michalenko and Ameesh Shah and Abhinav Verma and Richard G. Baraniuk and Swarat Chaudhuri and Ankit B. Patel},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10297},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

15 Pages, 13 Figures, Accepted to ICLR 2019