English

Representability of Hom implies flatness

Algebraic Geometry 2007-05-23 v1

Abstract

Let XX be a projective scheme over a noetherian base scheme SS, and let FF be a coherent sheaf on XX. For any coherent sheaf EE on XX, consider the set-valued contravariant functor HomE,FHom_{E,F} on SS-schemes, defined by HomE,F(T)=Hom(ET,FT)Hom_{E,F}(T) = Hom(E_T,F_T) where ETE_T and FTF_T are the pull-backs of EE and FF to XT=X×STX_T = X\times_S T. A basic result of Grothendieck ([EGA] III 7.7.8, 7.7.9) says that if FF is flat over SS then HomE,FHom_{E,F} is representable for all EE. We prove the converse of the above, in fact, we show that if LL is a relatively ample line bundle on XX over SS such that the functor HomLn,FHom_{L^{-n},F} is representable for infinitely many positive integers nn, then FF is flat over SS. As a corollary, taking X=SX=S, it follows that if FF is a coherent sheaf on SS then the functor TH0(T,FT)T\mapsto H^0(T, F_T) on the category of SS-schemes is representable if and only if FF is locally free on SS. This answers a question posed by Angelo Vistoli. The techniques we use involve the proof of flattening stratification, together with the methods used in proving the author's earlier result (see arXiv.org/abs/math.AG/0204047) that the automorphism group functor of a coherent sheaf on SS is representable if and only if the sheaf is locally free.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0308036,
  title  = {Representability of Hom implies flatness},
  author = {Nitin Nitsure},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0308036},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

9 pages, LaTeX