Reply to comments on "Weak value amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection"
Quantum Physics
2014-02-13 v1
Abstract
Kedem's Comment [arXiv:1402.1352] on our Letter [PRL 112, 040406 (2014)] contains only the criticism that we did not consider complex weak values. We point out follow-up work which uses the same analysis as in our Letter, includes any type of weak values and draws the same conclusion. Vaidman's Comment [arXiv:1402.0199] on our Letter can be deconstructed in to two distinct logical fallacies.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1402.2954,
title = {Reply to comments on "Weak value amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection"},
author = {Christopher Ferrie and Joshua Combes},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.2954},
year = {2014}
}