Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky
Superconductivity
2007-05-23 v1 Strongly Correlated Electrons
Abstract
The reason behind the discrepancy between the phase diagrams of our earlier work [1] and the comment of Sheehy and Radzihovsky [2] is discussed. We show that, in contrast to what is claimed in [2], the requirement of positive susceptibility is sufficient to rule out states that are local maximum of the free energy (as a function of the order parameter
Cite
@article{arxiv.cond-mat/0608501,
title = {Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky},
author = {C. -H. Pao and S. -T. Wu and S. -K. Yip},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:cond-mat/0608501},
year = {2007}
}
Comments
6 pages, 1 figure