Reply to "Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' "
Quantum Physics
2015-06-05 v1
Abstract
In this reply I address the comment by W-Y. Hwang and O. Gittsovich on my paper [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 82}, 032313 (2010)]. The authors of the comment point out that I use implicit assumption that the alphabet of the eavesdropper is binary. They claim that such assumption is unrealistic. Here I show that even without this assumption the main result of my paper still holds.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1205.6672,
title = {Reply to "Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' "},
author = {M. Pawlowski},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.6672},
year = {2015}
}
Comments
for the comment see arXiv:1204.4235