English

Remark on dyadic pointwise domination and median oscillation decomposition

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2017-06-27 v1

Abstract

In this note, we do the following: a) By using Lacey's recent technique, we give an alternative proof for Conde-Alonso and Rey's domination theorem, which states that each positive dyadic operator of arbitrary complexity is pointwise dominated by a positive dyadic operator of zero complexity: SSfS(k)μ1S(k+1)SSfSμ1S. \sum_{S\in\mathcal{S}} \langle f \rangle^\mu_{S^{(k)}} 1_S\lesssim (k+1) \sum_{S'\in\mathcal{S}'} \langle f \rangle^\mu_{S'} 1_{S'}. b) By following the analogue between median and mean oscillation, we extend Lerner's local median oscillation decomposition to arbitrary (possibly non-doubling) measures: fm(f,S0^)1S0SS(ωλ(f;S)+m(f,S)m(f,S^))1S.\lvert f-m(f,\hat{S_0})\rvert 1_{S_0}\lesssim \sum_{S\in\mathcal{S}} (\omega_\lambda(f;S)+\lvert m(f,S)-m(f,\hat{S}) \rvert )1_S. This can be viewed as a median oscillation decomposition adapted to the dyadic (martingale) BMO. As an application of the decomposition, we give an alternative proof for the dyadic (martingale) John--Nirenberg inequality, and for Lacey's domination theorem, which states that each martingale transform is pointwise dominated by a positive dyadic operator of complexity zero.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1502.05942,
  title  = {Remark on dyadic pointwise domination and median oscillation decomposition},
  author = {Timo S. Hänninen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05942},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

11 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-22T08:34:10.322Z