Remark 3.4 A Dedekind Finite Borel Set
Logic
2015-10-01 v1
Abstract
Asaf Karagila pointed out that Remark 3.4 [1], directly contradicts Theorem 3.3 (c) [2] which was incorrectly stated. This note contains a proof of this remark. [1] Miller, Arnold W.; A Dedekind Finite Borel Set, Arch. Math. Logic 50 (2011), no. 1-2, 1--17. [2] Kanamori, A.; Pincus, D.; Does GCH imply AC locally?, Paul Erdos and his mathematics, II (Budapest, 1999), 413-426, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., 11, Janos Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 2002.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1509.08947,
title = {Remark 3.4 A Dedekind Finite Borel Set},
author = {Arnold W. Miller},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.08947},
year = {2015}
}