English

Relative Framing of Transverse knots

Symplectic Geometry 2007-05-23 v3 Geometric Topology

Abstract

It is well-known that a knot in a contact manifold (M,C)(M,C) transverse to a trivialized contact structure possesses the natural framing given by the first of the trivialization vectors along the knot. If the Euler class eCH2(M)e_C\in H^2(M) of CC is nonzero, then CC is nontrvivializable and the natural framing of transverse knots does not exist. We construct a new framing-type invariant of transverse knots called relative framing. It is defined for all tight CC, all closed irreducible atoroidal MM, and many other cases when eC0e_C\neq 0 and the classical framing invariant is not defined. We show that the relative framing distinguishes many transverse knots that are isotopic as unframed knots. It also allows one to define the Bennequin invariant of a zero-homologous transverse knot in contact manifolds (M,C)(M,C) with eC0e_C\neq 0. Our recent result is that the groups of Vassiliev-Goussarov invariants of transverse and of framed knots are canonically isomorphic, when CC is trivialized and transverse knots have the natural framing. We show that the same result is true whenever the relative framing is well-defined.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0104009,
  title  = {Relative Framing of Transverse knots},
  author = {Vladimir Chernov},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0104009},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

13 pages, 5 figures We have added the Theorem saying that the groups of Vassiliev invariants of transverse and of framed knots are canonically isomorphic when the relative framing of transverse knots is well-defined. We have also added new examples where relative framing distinguishes transverse knots isotopic as ordinary knots

R2 v1 2026-07-22T16:37:59.723Z