English

Relations among different privacy notions

Cryptography and Security 2019-11-05 v1 Computers and Society

Abstract

We present a comprehensive view of the relations among several privacy notions: differential privacy (DP) [1], Bayesian differential privacy (BDP) [2], semantic privacy (SP) [3], and membership privacy (MP) [4]. The results are organized into two parts. In part one, we extend the notion of semantic privacy (SP) to Bayesian semantic privacy (BSP) and show its essential equivalence with Bayesian differential privacy (BDP) in the quantitative sense. We prove the relations between BDP, BSP, and SP as follows: ϵ\epsilon-BDP \Longleftarrow (121eϵ+1)\big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{e^{\epsilon}+1}\big)-BSP, and ϵ\epsilon-BDP \Longrightarrow (e2ϵ1)(e^{2\epsilon}-1)-BSP \Longrightarrow (e2ϵ1)(e^{2\epsilon}-1)-SP. In addition, we obtain a minor result ϵ\epsilon-DP \Longleftarrow (121eϵ+1)\big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{e^{\epsilon}+1}\big)-SP, which improves the result of Kasiviswanathan and Smith [3] stating ϵ\epsilon-DP \Longleftarrow ϵ/6\epsilon/6-SP for ϵ1.35\epsilon \leq 1.35. In part two, we establish the relations between BDP and MP. First, ϵ\epsilon-BDP \Longrightarrow ϵ\epsilon-MP. Second, for a family of distributions that are downward scalable in the sense of Li et al. [4], it is shown that ϵ\epsilon-BDP \Longleftarrow ϵ\epsilon-MP.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1911.00761,
  title  = {Relations among different privacy notions},
  author = {Jun Zhao},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00761},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

Published in: IEEE 55th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), UIUC, Illinois, US, October 2017

R2 v1 2026-06-23T12:03:03.564Z