English

Relating Domination, Exponential Domination, and Porous Exponential Domination

Combinatorics 2016-05-17 v1

Abstract

The domination number γ(G)\gamma(G) of a graph GG, its exponential domination number γe(G)\gamma_e(G), and its porous exponential domination number γe(G)\gamma_e^*(G) satisfy γe(G)γe(G)γ(G)\gamma_e^*(G)\leq \gamma_e(G)\leq \gamma(G). We contribute results about the gaps in these inequalities as well as the graphs for which some of the inequalities hold with equality. Relaxing the natural integer linear program whose optimum value is γe(G)\gamma_e^*(G), we are led to the definition of the fractional porous exponential domination number γe,f(G)\gamma_{e,f}^*(G) of a graph GG. For a subcubic tree TT of order nn, we show γe,f(T)=n+26\gamma_{e,f}^*(T)=\frac{n+2}{6} and γe(T)2γe,f(T)\gamma_e(T)\leq 2\gamma_{e,f}^*(T). We characterize the two classes of subcubic trees TT with γe(T)=γe,f(T)\gamma_e(T)=\gamma_{e,f}^*(T) and γ(T)=γe(T)\gamma(T)=\gamma_e(T), respectively. Using linear programming arguments, we establish several lower bounds on the fractional porous exponential domination number in more general settings.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1605.04575,
  title  = {Relating Domination, Exponential Domination, and Porous Exponential Domination},
  author = {Michael A. Henning and Simon Jäger and Dieter Rautenbach},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.04575},
  year   = {2016}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T14:01:10.982Z