English

Relating dissociation, independence, and matchings

Combinatorics 2022-02-03 v1

Abstract

A dissociation set in a graph is a set of vertices inducing a subgraph of maximum degree at most 11. Computing the dissociation number diss(G){\rm diss}(G) of a given graph GG, defined as the order of a maximum dissociation set in GG, is algorithmically hard even when GG is restricted to be bipartite. Recently, Hosseinian and Butenko proposed a simple 43\frac{4}{3}-approximation algorithm for the dissociation number problem in bipartite graphs. Their result relies on the inequality diss(G)43α(GM){\rm diss}(G)\leq\frac{4}{3}\alpha(G-M) implicit in their work, where GG is a bipartite graph, MM is a maximum matching in GG, and α(GM)\alpha(G-M) denotes the independence number of GMG-M. We show that the pairs (G,M)(G,M) for which this inequality holds with equality can be recognized efficiently, and that a maximum dissociation set can be determined for them efficiently. The dissociation number of a graph GG satisfies max{α(G),2νs(G)}diss(G)α(G)+νs(G)2α(G)\max\{ \alpha(G),2\nu_s(G)\} \leq {\rm diss}(G)\leq \alpha(G)+\nu_s(G)\leq 2\alpha(G), where νs(G)\nu_s(G) denotes the induced matching number of GG. We show that deciding whether diss(G){\rm diss}(G) equals any of the four terms lower and upper bounding diss(G){\rm diss}(G) is NP-hard.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2202.01004,
  title  = {Relating dissociation, independence, and matchings},
  author = {Felix Bock and Johannes Pardey and Lucia D. Penso and Dieter Rautenbach},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.01004},
  year   = {2022}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-24T09:15:38.178Z