Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tunes a Sparse Subnetwork in Large Language Models
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a key post-pretraining step for aligning large language models (LLMs) with complex tasks and human preferences. While it is often assumed that RL fine-tuning requires updating most of a model's parameters, we challenge this assumption with a surprising finding: RL fine-tuning consistently modifies only a small subnetwork (typically 5-30% of weights), leaving most parameters unchanged. We call this phenomenon RL-induced parameter update sparsity. It arises naturally, without any sparsity constraints or parameter-efficient tuning, and appears across multiple RL algorithms (e.g., PPO, DPO, SimPO, PRIME) and model families (e.g., OpenAI, Meta, and open-source LLMs). Moreover, the subnetworks updated by RL show substantial overlap across different seeds, datasets, and algorithms-far exceeding chance-suggesting a partially transferable structure in the pretrained model. We show that fine-tuning only this sparse subnetwork recovers full model performance and yields parameters nearly identical to the fully fine-tuned model. Our analysis suggests this sparsity emerges because RL operates near the model's original distribution, requiring only targeted changes. KL penalties, gradient clipping, and on-policy dynamics have limited effect on the sparsity pattern. These findings shed new light on how RL adapts models: not by shifting all weights, but by focusing training on a small, consistently updated subnetwork. This insight enables more efficient RL methods and reframes sparsity through the lens of the lottery ticket hypothesis.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2507.17107,
title = {Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tunes a Sparse Subnetwork in Large Language Models},
author = {Andrii Balashov},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.17107},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
The manuscript has been withdrawn due to significant overlap in methodology and results with a prior work (arXiv:2505.11711) that we were not aware of at the time of submission. To maintain academic integrity and avoid redundancy in the literature, we have chosen to withdraw this version