Regularisation in Nonperturbative Extensions of Effective Field Theory
Abstract
The process of renormalisation in nonperturbative Hamiltonian Effective Field Theory (HEFT) is examined in the -resonance scattering channel. As an extension of effective field theory incorporating the L\"uscher formalism, HEFT provides a bridge between the infinite-volume scattering data of experiment and the finite-volume spectrum of energy eigenstates in lattice QCD. HEFT also provides phenomenological insight into the basis-state composition of the finite-volume eigenstates via the state eigenvectors. The Hamiltonian matrix is made finite through the introduction of finite-range regularisation. The extent to which the established features of this regularisation scheme survive in HEFT is examined. In a single-channel analysis, fits to experimental phase shifts withstand large variations in the regularisation parameter, , providing an opportunity to explore the sensitivity of the finite-volume spectrum and state composition on the regulator. While the L\"uscher formalism ensures the eigenvalues are insensitive to variation in the single-channel case, the eigenstate composition varies with ; the admission of short distance interactions diminishes single-particle contributions to the states. In the two-channel , analysis, is restricted to a small range by the experimental data. Here the inelasticity is particularly sensitive to variations in and its associated parameter set. This sensitivity is also manifest in the finite-volume spectrum for states near the opening of the scattering channel. Finally, HEFT has the unique ability to describe the quark-mass dependence of the finite-volume eigenstates. The robust nature of this capability is presented and used to confront current state-of-the-art lattice QCD calculations.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2110.14113,
title = {Regularisation in Nonperturbative Extensions of Effective Field Theory},
author = {Curtis D. Abell and Derek B. Leinweber and Anthony W. Thomas and Jia-Jun Wu},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14113},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
21 pages, 22 figures