English

Redshift-Independent Distances in the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database: Methodology, Content and Use of NED-D

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2017-01-13 v1 Astrophysics of Galaxies

Abstract

Estimates of galaxy distances based on indicators that are independent of cosmological redshift are fundamental to astrophysics. Researchers use them to establish the extragalactic distance scale, to underpin estimates of the Hubble constant, and to study peculiar velocities induced by gravitational attractions that perturb the motions of galaxies with respect to the Hubble flow of universal expansion. In 2006 the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) began making available a comprehensive compilation of redshift-independent extragalactic distance estimates. A decade later, this compendium of distances (NED-D) now contains more than 100,000 individual estimates based on primary and secondary indicators, available for more than 28,000 galaxies, and compiled from over 2,000 references in the refereed astronomical literature. This article describes the methodology, content, and use of NED-D, and addresses challenges to be overcome in compiling such distances. Currently, 75 different distance indicators are in use. We include a figure that facilitates comparison of the indicators with significant numbers of estimates in terms of the minimum, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, and maximum distances spanned. Brief descriptions of the indicators, including examples of their use in the database, are given in an Appendix.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1612.09263,
  title  = {Redshift-Independent Distances in the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database: Methodology, Content and Use of NED-D},
  author = {Ian Steer and Barry F. Madore and Joseph M. Mazzarella and Marion Schmitz and Harold G. Corwin, and Ben H. P. Chan and Rick Ebert and George Helou and Kay Baker and Xi Chen and Cren Frayer and Jeff Jacobson and Tak Lo and Patrick Ogle and Olga Pevunova and Scott Terek},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.09263},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

online version (of record) published Thursday, 29 December, 2016