English

Recognition of algebraic matroids is undecidable

Combinatorics 2026-07-16 v1 Logic

Abstract

We prove that the recognition problem for algebraic matroids is undecidable. Explicitly, this means that there is no algorithm that takes as input a finite set SS and a function r ⁣:P(S)Z0r\colon\mathcal{P}(S) \to \mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0} (where P(S)\mathcal{P}(S) is the power set) and decides whether there exists a pair of fields FKF \subset K, and a function f ⁣:SKf\colon S \to K, such that for all ASA \subseteq S: tr.degK/F(f(A))=r(A)\mathrm{tr.deg}_{K/F}(f(A)) = r(A). This problem is known to be decidable if the characteristic of the fields involved is constrained to be zero. We prove that it is undecidable if the characteristic is either left unspecified (in which case a realization over any characteristic is accepted) or fixed to be a prime pp. The proof relies on Hrushovski--Zilber's Group Configuration Theorem and on the work of Evans and Hrushovski on "Projective Planes in Algebraically Closed Fields". We relate two different such projective planes, and eventually construct a reduction from the solvability of Diophantine equations over Fp(x)\mathbb{F}_p(x) (pp prime) to algebraicity of matroids. Solvability of Diophantine equations over Fp(x)\mathbb{F}_p(x) was proved to be undecidable by Pheidas for all p>2p > 2, and later by Videla for p=2p=2. A central part of our proof is a variant of the so-called Field Configuration Theorem.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2607.14907,
  title  = {Recognition of algebraic matroids is undecidable},
  author = {Tobias Boege and Geva Yashfe},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.14907},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

29 pages, 7 figures. Comments are welcome!