Human reasoning involves different strategies, each suited to specific problems. Prior work shows that large language model (LLMs) tend to favor a single reasoning strategy, potentially limiting their effectiveness in diverse reasoning challenges. In this work, we investigate whether prompting can control LLMs reasoning strategies and assess its impact on logical problem-solving. While our experiments show that no single strategy consistently improves accuracy, performance could be enhanced if models could adaptively choose the optimal strategy. We propose methods to guide LLMs in strategy selection, highlighting new ways to refine their reasoning abilities.
@article{arxiv.2507.11423,
title = {Reasoning Strategies in Large Language Models: Can They Follow, Prefer, and Optimize?},
author = {Yanjian Zhang and Guillaume Wisniewski and Nadi Tomeh and Thierry Charnois},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.11423},
year = {2025}
}