Realistic predictions for Gaia black hole discoveries: comparison of isolated binary and dynamical formation models
Abstract
Astrometry from Gaia has enabled discovery of three dormant black holes (BHs) in au-scale binaries. Numerous models have been proposed to explain their formation, including several that have forecasted Gaia detections. However, previous works have used simplified detectability metrics that do not capture key elements of the Gaia astrometric orbit selection function. We apply a realistic forward-model of Gaia astrometric orbit catalogs to BH binary populations generated through (a) isolated binary evolution (IBE) and (b) dynamical formation in star clusters. For both formation channels, we analyze binary populations in a simulated Milky Way-like galaxy with a realistic metallicity-dependent star formation history and 3D dust map. We generate epoch astrometry for each binary from the Gaia scanning law and fit it with the cascade of astrometric models used in Gaia DR3. The IBE model of Chawla et al. (2022) predicts that no BH binaries should have been detected in DR3 and thus significantly underpredicts the formation rate of Gaia BHs. In contrast, the dynamical model of Di Carlo et al. (2024) overpredicts the number of BHs receiving DR3 orbital solutions by a factor of 8. The two models predict very different orbital period distributions, with the IBE model predicting only binaries that avoided common envelope evolution and have d to be detectable, and the dynamical formation model predicting a period distribution that is roughly log-uniform. Adopting the dynamical channel as a fiducial model and rescaling by a factor of 1/8 to match DR3, we predict that 30 BH binaries will be detected in Gaia DR4, representing of Milky Way BHs with luminous companions in au-scale orbits.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2502.03527,
title = {Realistic predictions for Gaia black hole discoveries: comparison of isolated binary and dynamical formation models},
author = {Pranav Nagarajan and Kareem El-Badry and Chirag Chawla and Ugo Niccolò Di Carlo and Katelyn Breivik and Carl L. Rodriguez and Poojan Agrawal and Vera Delfavero and Sourav Chatterjee},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03527},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
17 pages, 14 figures, Accepted to PASP