English

Rapid accretion state transitions following the tidal disruption event AT2018fyk

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2021-05-26 v2

Abstract

Following a tidal disruption event (TDE), the accretion rate can evolve from quiescent to near-Eddington levels and back over months - years timescales. This provides a unique opportunity to study the formation and evolution of the accretion flow around supermassive black holes (SMBHs). We present two years of multi-wavelength monitoring observations of the TDE AT2018fyk at X-ray, UV, optical and radio wavelengths. We identify three distinct accretion states and two state transitions between them. These appear remarkably similar to the behaviour of stellar-mass black holes in outburst. The X-ray spectral properties show a transition from a soft (thermal-dominated) to a hard (power-law dominated) spectral state around Lbol_{\rm bol} \sim few ×102 \times 10^{-2} LEdd_{\rm Edd}, and the strengthening of the corona over time \sim100--200 days after the UV/optical peak. Contemporaneously, the spectral energy distribution (in particular, the UV-to-X-ray spectral slope αox\alpha_{ox}) shows a pronounced softening as the outburst progresses. The X-ray timing properties also show a marked change, initially dominated by variability at long (>>day) timescales while a high frequency (\sim103^{-3} Hz) component emerges after the transition into the hard state. At late times (\sim500 days after peak), a second accretion state transition occurs, from the hard into the quiescent state, as identified by the sudden collapse of the bolometric (X-ray+UV) emission to levels below 103.4^{-3.4} LEdd_{\rm Edd}. Our findings illustrate that TDEs can be used to study the scale (in)variance of accretion processes in individual SMBHs. Consequently, they provide a new avenue to study accretion states over seven orders of magnitude in black hole mass, removing limitations inherent to commonly used ensemble studies.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2101.04692,
  title  = {Rapid accretion state transitions following the tidal disruption event AT2018fyk},
  author = {Thomas Wevers and Dheeraj R. Pasham and Sjoert van Velzen and James C. A. Miller-Jones and Phil Uttley and Keith Gendreau and Ronald Remillard and Zaven Arzoumanian and Michael Loewenstein and Ani Chiti},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04692},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

Accepted version following referee comments. 2 new figures compared to previous arxiv version (Figs 9 and 10). Data will be available from the journal webpages, or upon request to the authors