English

Randomization-based Machine Learning in Renewable Energy Prediction Problems: Critical Literature Review, New Results and Perspectives

Machine Learning 2021-03-29 v1 Neural and Evolutionary Computing

Abstract

Randomization-based Machine Learning methods for prediction are currently a hot topic in Artificial Intelligence, due to their excellent performance in many prediction problems, with a bounded computation time. The application of randomization-based approaches to renewable energy prediction problems has been massive in the last few years, including many different types of randomization-based approaches, their hybridization with other techniques and also the description of new versions of classical randomization-based algorithms, including deep and ensemble approaches. In this paper we review the most important characteristics of randomization-based machine learning approaches and their application to renewable energy prediction problems. We describe the most important methods and algorithms of this family of modeling methods, and perform a critical literature review, examining prediction problems related to solar, wind, marine/ocean and hydro-power renewable sources. We support our critical analysis with an extensive experimental study, comprising real-world problems related to solar, wind and hydro-power energy, where randomization-based algorithms are found to achieve superior results at a significantly lower computational cost than other modeling counterparts. We end our survey with a prospect of the most important challenges and research directions that remain open this field, along with an outlook motivating further research efforts in this exciting research field.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2103.14624,
  title  = {Randomization-based Machine Learning in Renewable Energy Prediction Problems: Critical Literature Review, New Results and Perspectives},
  author = {Javier Del Ser and David Casillas-Perez and Laura Cornejo-Bueno and Luis Prieto-Godino and Julia Sanz-Justo and Carlos Casanova-Mateo and Sancho Salcedo-Sanz},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14624},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

88 pages, 14 figures, 12 tables. Under review