Rainbow Cycle Number and EFX Allocations: (Almost) Closing the Gap
Abstract
Recently, some studies on the fair allocation of indivisible goods notice a connection between a purely combinatorial problem called the Rainbow Cycle problem and a fairness notion known as : assuming that the rainbow cycle number for parameter (i.e. ) is , we can find a - allocation with number of discarded goods \cite{chaudhury2021improving}. The best upper bound on is improved in a series of works to \cite{chaudhury2021improving}, \cite{berendsohn2022fixed}, and finally to \cite{Akrami2022}.\footnote{We refer to the note at the end of the introduction for a short discussion on the result of \cite{Akrami2022}.} Also, via a simple observation, we have \cite{chaudhury2021improving}. In this paper, we introduce another problem in extremal combinatorics. For a parameter , we define the rainbow path degree and denote it by . We show that any lower bound on yields an upper bound on . Next, we prove that which yields an almost tight upper bound of . This in turn proves the existence of - allocation with number of discarded goods. In addition, for the special case of the Rainbow Cycle problem that the edges in each part form a permutation, we improve the upper bound to . We leverage to achieve this bound. Our conjecture is that the exact value of is . We provide some experiments that support this conjecture. Assuming this conjecture is correct, we have .
Cite
@article{arxiv.2212.09482,
title = {Rainbow Cycle Number and EFX Allocations: (Almost) Closing the Gap},
author = {Shayan Chashm Jahan and Masoud Seddighin and Seyed-Mohammad Seyed-Javadi and Mohammad Sharifi},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09482},
year = {2023}
}