English

Quantum oracles for the finite element method

Quantum Physics 2025-04-29 v1

Abstract

In order to assess potential advantages of quantum algorithms that require quantum oracles as subroutines, the careful evaluation of the overall complexity of the oracles themselves is crucial. This study examines the quantum routines required for the implementation of oracles used in the block-encoding of the N×NN \times N stiffness and mass matrices, which typically emerge in the finite element analysis of elastic structures. Starting from basic quantum adders, we show how to construct the necessary oracles, which require the calculation of polynomials, square root and the implementation of conditional operations. We propose quantum subroutines based on fixed-point arithmetic that, given an rr-qubit register, construct the oracle using O((K+L+Ngeo+ND)r)\mathcal{O}((K + L + N_{\mathrm{geo}} + N_{\mathrm{D}}) r) ancilla qubits and have a O((K+L)r2+log2(Ngeo+ND))\mathcal{O}((K + L)r^2 + \log_2(N_{\mathrm{geo}} + N_{\mathrm{D}})) runtime, with KK the order at which we truncate the polynomials, LL the number of iterations in the Newton-Raphson subroutine for the square root, while NgeoN_{\mathrm{geo}} and NDN_{\mathrm{D}} are the number of hypercuboids used to approximate the geometry and the boundary, respectively. Since in practice rr scales as r=O(log2N)r = \mathcal{O}(\log_2 N), and assuming that the other parameters are fixed independently of NN, this shows that the oracles, while still costly in practice, do not endanger potential polynomial or exponential advantages in NN.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2504.19827,
  title  = {Quantum oracles for the finite element method},
  author = {Sven Danz and Tobias Stollenwerk and Alessandro Ciani},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19827},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

14+7 pages, 17 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-28T23:13:49.626Z