English

Quantum Hyperbolic State Sum Invariants of 3-Manifolds

Geometric Topology 2007-05-23 v2 High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract

Any triple (W,L,ρ)(W,L,\rho), where WW is a compact closed oriented 3-manifold, LL is a link in WW and ρ\rho is a flat principal BB-bundle over WW (BB is the Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices of SL(2,\mc)SL(2,\mc)), can be encoded by suitable {\it distinguished} and {\it decorated} triangulations T=(T,H,D){\cal T}=(T,H,{\cal D}). For each T\cal T, for each odd integer N3N\geq 3, one defines a state sum KN(T)K_N({\cal T}), based on the Faddeev-Kashaev quantum dilogarithm at ω=exp(2πi/N)\omega =\exp(2\pi i/N), such that KN(W,L,ρ)=KN(T)K_N(W,L,\rho)=K_N({\cal T}) is a well-defined complex valued invariant. The purely topological, conjectural invariants KN(W,L)K_N(W,L) proposed earlier by Kashaev correspond to the special case of the {\it trivial} flat bundle. Moreover, we extend the definition of these invariants to the case of flat bundles on WLW\setminus L with non necessarily trivial holonomy along the meridians of the link's components, and also to 3-manifolds endowed with a BB-flat bundle and with \emph{arbitrary} non-spherical parametrized boundary components. We point out some remarkable specializations of the invariants; among these, the so called {\it Seifert-type} invariants, when W=S3W=S^3: these seem to be good candidates in orther to fully reconduct the Jones polynomials in the main stream of quantum hyperbolic invariants. Finally, we try to set our results against the heuristic backgroud of the Euclidean analytic continuation of (2+1)-quantum gravity with negative cosmological constant, regarded as a gauge theory with the {\it non compact} group SO(3,1) as gauge group.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0101234,
  title  = {Quantum Hyperbolic State Sum Invariants of 3-Manifolds},
  author = {Stephane Baseilhac and Riccardo Benedetti},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0101234},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

36 pages (including an 6-pages Appendix), 7 figures. Replacement's motivations: language improved, general clarification and minor corrections in the last section, elimination of proposition 4.4 of the previous version due to unsatisfactory proof

R2 v1 2026-07-22T16:37:03.924Z