English

Quantitative causality, causality-guided scientific discovery, and causal machine learning

Artificial Intelligence 2024-02-22 v1 Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability

Abstract

It has been said, arguably, that causality analysis should pave a promising way to interpretable deep learning and generalization. Incorporation of causality into artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, however, is challenged with its vagueness, non-quantitiveness, computational inefficiency, etc. During the past 18 years, these challenges have been essentially resolved, with the establishment of a rigorous formalism of causality analysis initially motivated from atmospheric predictability. This not only opens a new field in the atmosphere-ocean science, namely, information flow, but also has led to scientific discoveries in other disciplines, such as quantum mechanics, neuroscience, financial economics, etc., through various applications. This note provides a brief review of the decade-long effort, including a list of major theoretical results, a sketch of the causal deep learning framework, and some representative real-world applications in geoscience pertaining to this journal, such as those on the anthropogenic cause of global warming, the decadal prediction of El Ni\~no Modoki, the forecasting of an extreme drought in China, among others.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2402.13427,
  title  = {Quantitative causality, causality-guided scientific discovery, and causal machine learning},
  author = {X. San Liang and Dake Chen and Renhe Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13427},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

10 pages, 3 figures. To appear in Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Research. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2112.14839

R2 v1 2026-06-28T14:55:12.370Z