English

QCD corrections to the $B_c$ to charmonia semi-leptonic decays

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2014-09-02 v1

Abstract

We present a detailed analysis on the BcB_c meson semi-leptonic decays, Bcηc(J/ψ)νB_c \to \eta_c (J/\psi) \ell \nu, up to next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD correction. We adopt the principle of maximum conformality (PMC) to set the renormalization scales for those decays. After applying the PMC scale setting, we determine the optimal renormalization scale for the Bcηc(J/ψ)B_c\to\eta_c(J/\psi) transition form factors (TFFs). Because of the same {β0}\{\beta_0\}-terms, the optimal PMC scales at the NLO level are the same for all those TFFs, i.e. μrPMC0.8GeV\mu_r^{\rm PMC} \approx 0.8{\rm GeV}. We adopt a strong coupling model from the massive perturbation theory (MPT) to achieve a reliable pQCD estimation in this low energy region. Furthermore, we adopt a monopole form as an extrapolation for the Bcηc(J/ψ)B_c\to\eta_c(J/\psi) TFFs to all their allowable q2q^2 region. Then, we predict ΓBcηcν(=e,μ)=(71.538.90+11.27)×1015GeV\Gamma_{B_c \to \eta_c \ell \nu}(\ell=e,\mu) =(71.53^{+11.27}_{-8.90})\times 10^{-15} {\rm GeV}, ΓBcηcτν=(27.144.33+5.93)×1015GeV\Gamma_{B_c \to \eta_c \tau \nu}=(27.14^{+5.93}_{-4.33})\times 10^{-15} {\rm GeV}, ΓBcJ/ψν(=e,μ)=(106.3114.01+18.59)×1015GeV\Gamma_{B_c \to J/\psi \ell \nu}(\ell=e,\mu) =(106.31^{+18.59}_{-14.01}) \times 10^{-15} {\rm GeV}, ΓBcJ/ψτν=(28.254.35+6.02)×1015GeV\Gamma_{B_c \to J/\psi \tau \nu} =(28.25^{+6.02}_{-4.35})\times 10^{-15} {\rm GeV}, where the uncertainties are squared averages of all the mentioned error sources. We show that the present prediction of the production cross section times branching ratio for Bc+J/ψ+vB^+_c\to J/\psi \ell^+ v relative to that for B+J/ψK+B^+ \to J/\psi K^+, i.e. (J/ψ+ν)\Re(J/\psi \ell^+ \nu), is in a better agreement with CDF measurements than the previous predictions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1407.7309,
  title  = {QCD corrections to the $B_c$ to charmonia semi-leptonic decays},
  author = {Jian-Ming Shen and Xing-Gang Wu and Hong-Hao Ma and Sheng-Quan Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.7309},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

11 pages, 5 figures