Proportional Consistency of Apportionment Methods
Abstract
We analyze a little-known property of apportionment methods that captures how allocations scale with the size of the house: specifically, if, for a fixed population distribution, the house size and allocation can be scaled down within the set of integers, then the apportionment should be correspondingly scaled down. Balinski and Young (2001) include this property among the minimal requirements for a "reasonable" apportionment method. We argue that this property is better understood as a consistency requirement since quota-based apportionments that are "less proportional" meet this requirement while others that are "more proportional" do not. We also show that the family of quotatone methods based on stationary divisors (including the quota method) do not satisfy this property.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2311.06969,
title = {Proportional Consistency of Apportionment Methods},
author = {Michael A. Jones and David McCune and Jennifer M. Wilson},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06969},
year = {2023}
}