Properties of a hypothetical cold pulsar wind in LS~5039
Abstract
LS~5039 is a powerful gamma-ray binary that probably hosts a non-accreting pulsar. Despite the wealth of data available, the power source of the non-thermal emitter is still unknown. We use a dynamical-radiative numerical model and multiwavelength data to constrain the properties of a pulsar wind that may power the non-thermal emitter in LS~5039. We ran simulations of an ultrarelativistic (low-) cold -wind that Compton scatters stellar photons and that dynamically interacts with the stellar wind. The effects of energy losses on the unshocked -wind dynamics, and the geometry of the two-wind contact discontinuity, are computed for different wind models. The predicted unshocked -wind radiation at periastron, when expected to be highest, is compared to LS~5039 data. The minimum possible radiation from an isotropic cold -wind overpredicts the X-ray to gamma-ray fluxes at periastron by a factor of . In the anisotropic wind case X-ray and MeV data are not violated by wind radiation if the wind axis is at from the line of sight (probability of \%), depending on the anisotropic wind model, or if the wind Lorentz factor , in which case the wind power can be higher, but it requires -multiplicities of and for a ~s and 10~s pulsar period, respectively. The studied model predicts that a low- cold pulsar -wind in LS~5039 should be strongly anisotropic, with either a wind Lorentz factor and very high multiplicities or with a fine-tuned wind orientation. A low-, cold baryon-dominated wind would be possible, but then the multiplicities should be rather low, while the baryon-to- energy transfer should be very efficient at wind termination. A strongly magnetized cold wind seems to be the most favorable (least constrained) option.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2012.11578,
title = {Properties of a hypothetical cold pulsar wind in LS~5039},
author = {V. Bosch-Ramon},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.11578},
year = {2021}
}
Comments
6 pages, 2 figures, version after proofs, published in Astronomy and Astrophysics (abstract abridged), Eq. 10 corrected