Proof Supplement - Learning Sparse Causal Models is not NP-hard (UAI2013)
Machine Learning
2014-11-07 v1
Abstract
This article contains detailed proofs and additional examples related to the UAI-2013 submission `Learning Sparse Causal Models is not NP-hard'. It describes the FCI+ algorithm: a method for sound and complete causal model discovery in the presence of latent confounders and/or selection bias, that has worst case polynomial complexity of order in the number of independence tests, for sparse graphs over nodes, bounded by node degree . The algorithm is an adaptation of the well-known FCI algorithm by (Spirtes et al., 2000) that is also sound and complete, but has worst case complexity exponential in .
Cite
@article{arxiv.1411.1557,
title = {Proof Supplement - Learning Sparse Causal Models is not NP-hard (UAI2013)},
author = {Tom Claassen and Joris M. Mooij and Tom Heskes},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1557},
year = {2014}
}
Comments
11 pages, supplement to `Learning Sparse Causal Models is not NP-hard' (UAI2013)