English

Projective twists and the Hopf correspondence

Symplectic Geometry 2024-12-25 v2

Abstract

Given Lagrangian (real, complex) projective spaces K1,,KmK_1, \dots , K_m in a Liouville manifold (X,ω)(X, \omega) satisfying a certain cohomological condition, we show there is a Lagrangian correspondence that assigns a Lagrangian sphere LiKL_i \subset K of another Liouville manifold (Y,Ω)(Y, \Omega) to any given projective Lagrangian KiXK_i \subset X, i=1,mi=1, \dots m. We use the Hopf correspondence to study \emph{projective twists}, a class of symplectomorphisms akin to Dehn twists, but defined starting from Lagrangian projective spaces. When this correspondence can be established, we show that it intertwines the autoequivalences of the compact Fukaya category Fuk(X)\mathcal{F}uk(X) induced by the (real, complex, quaternionic) projective twists τKiπ0(Sympct(X))\tau_{K_i} \in \pi_{0}(\mathrm{Symp}_{ct}(X)) with the corresponding autoequivalences of Fuk(Y)\mathcal{F}uk(Y) induced by the Dehn twists τLiπ0(Sympct(Y))\tau_{L_i} \in \pi_{0}(\mathrm{Symp}_{ct}(Y)), for i=1,mi=1, \dots m. Using the Hopf correspondence, we obtain a free generation result for projective twists in a \emph{clean plumbing} of projective spaces and various results about products of positive powers of Dehn/projective twists in Liouville manifolds. The same techniques are also used to show that the Hamiltonian isotopy class of the projective twist (along the zero section in TCPT^*\mathbb{CP}) in Sympct(TCPn)\mathrm{Symp}_{ct}(T^*\mathbb{CP}^n) does depend on a choice of framing, for n19n\geq19. Another application of the Hopf correspondence delivers two examples of smooth homotopy complex projective spaces KCPnK\simeq \mathbb{CP}^n that do not admit Lagrangian embeddings into (TCPn,dλCPn)(T^*\mathbb{CP}^n, d\lambda_{\mathbb{CP}^n}), for n=4,7n=4,7.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2006.12170,
  title  = {Projective twists and the Hopf correspondence},
  author = {Brunella Charlotte Torricelli},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12170},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

49 pages, 2 figures. Substantial changes and corrections throughout the paper. Most theorems (except stated) are unchanged but many constructions and proofs have been clarified or amended. Assumption C. and the quaternionic case removed. Sections 6.5,6.6,6.7 (Theorem 4b/6.15) removed. In Section 7.1 cx projective twist part (Theorem 5/7.1) removed. Section 7.2 (Theorem 6/7.5) removed

R2 v1 2026-06-23T16:30:57.988Z