English

Profinite and discrete G-spectra and iterated homotopy fixed points

Algebraic Topology 2016-09-21 v4

Abstract

For a profinite group GG, let (-)hG(\text{-})^{hG}, (-)hdG(\text{-})^{h_dG}, and (-)hG(\text{-})^{h'G} denote continuous homotopy fixed points for profinite GG-spectra, discrete GG-spectra, and continuous GG-spectra (coming from towers of discrete GG-spectra), respectively. We establish some connections between the first two notions, and by using Postnikov towers, for KcGK \vartriangleleft_c G (a closed normal subgroup), give various conditions for when the iterated homotopy fixed points (XhK)hG/K(X^{hK})^{hG/K} exist and are XhGX^{hG}. For the Lubin-Tate spectrum EnE_n and G<cGnG <_c G_n, the extended Morava stabilizer group, our results show that EnhKE_n^{hK} is a profinite G/KG/K-spectrum with (EnhK)hG/KEnhG(E_n^{hK})^{hG/K} \simeq E_n^{hG}, by an argument that possesses a certain technical simplicity not enjoyed by either the proof that (EnhK)hG/KEnhG(E_n^{h'K})^{h'G/K} \simeq E_n^{h'G} or the Devinatz-Hopkins proof (which requires G/K<|G/K| < \infty) of (EndhK)hdG/KEndhG(E_n^{dhK})^{h_dG/K} \simeq E_n^{dhG}, where EndhKE_n^{dhK} is a construction that behaves like continuous homotopy fixed points. Also, we prove that (in general) the G/KG/K-homotopy fixed point spectral sequence for π((EnhK)hG/K)\pi_\ast((E_n^{hK})^{hG/K}), with E2s,t=Hcs(G/K;πt(EnhK))E_2^{s,t} = H^s_c(G/K; \pi_t(E_n^{hK})) (continuous cohomology), is isomorphic to both the strongly convergent Lyndon-Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence of Devinatz for π(EndhG)\pi_\ast(E_n^{dhG}), with E2s,t=Hcs(G/K;πt(EndhK))E_2^{s,t} = H^s_c(G/K; \pi_t(E_n^{dhK})), and the descent spectral sequence for π((EnhK)hG/K)\pi_\ast((E_n^{h'K})^{h'G/K}).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1401.7150,
  title  = {Profinite and discrete G-spectra and iterated homotopy fixed points},
  author = {Daniel G. Davis and Gereon Quick},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.7150},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

36 pages. Made some changes based on the referee's comments. New content: Remarks 4.11 and 4.26, the last 5 lines of Remark 4.19, two comments about the G_n-action in 1st par. of Section 5, two entries in the References. We simplified the argument in the par. after Remark 4.17 and rewrote the first 7 lines of Remark 4.12. The writing was improved in a few other places