English

Processing and acquisition traces in visual encoders: What does CLIP know about your camera?

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2026-04-02 v2

Abstract

Prior work has analyzed the robustness of visual encoders to image transformations and corruptions, particularly in cases where such alterations are not seen during training. When this occurs, they introduce a form of distribution shift at test time, often leading to performance degradation. The primary focus has been on severe corruptions that, when applied aggressively, distort useful signals necessary for accurate semantic predictions. We take a different perspective by analyzing parameters of the image acquisition process and transformations that may be subtle or even imperceptible to the human eye. We find that such parameters are systematically encoded in the learned visual representations and can be easily recovered. More strikingly, their presence can have a profound impact, either positively or negatively, on semantic predictions. This effect depends on whether there is a strong correlation or anti-correlation between semantic labels and these acquisition-based or processing-based labels. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/ryan-caesar-ramos/visual-encoder-traces

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2508.10637,
  title  = {Processing and acquisition traces in visual encoders: What does CLIP know about your camera?},
  author = {Ryan Ramos and Vladan Stojnić and Giorgos Kordopatis-Zilos and Yuta Nakashima and Giorgos Tolias and Noa Garcia},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10637},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

8 main pages, supplementary attached, ICCV 2025 highlight

R2 v1 2026-07-01T04:49:54.771Z