English

Probing Thin Winds in Massive OB Stars of the SMC with JWST/NIRSPEC Br-alpha Spectroscopy

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2025-09-04 v1 Astrophysics of Galaxies

Abstract

Mass loss is a key physical process in the evolution of massive stars, the impact of which propagates into galactic evolution, population synthesis models, the interpretation of high-redshift galaxies, and explosive events such as supernovae. However, there are currently substantial uncertainties in the low-metallicity, low-luminosity thin wind regime where classical diagnostics (H-alpha and ultraviolet, UV, P Cygni profiles) yield wind momenta that are 1 to 2 orders of magnitude below prescriptions implemented by default in most evolutionary models. Here, we present spectra of the mass-loss diagnostic line Br-alpha in 15 OB-type stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud obtained using the Near Infrared Spectrograph on the James Webb Space Telescope. The line profile morphology, recovered by virtue of the outstanding signal-to-noise ratio of the data and the avoidance of regions with nebular emission, is consistent with predictions based on previous mass-loss rate estimates from optical and UV spectroscopy. Moreover, an initial spectroscopic analysis of sources covering the thin wind regime confirms the low mass-loss rates, indicates a change of slope in the wind-momentum-luminosity relation in this regime with respect to high-luminosity objects, and strengthens the abovementioned discrepancies with commonly used wind-momentum prescriptions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2509.02667,
  title  = {Probing Thin Winds in Massive OB Stars of the SMC with JWST/NIRSPEC Br-alpha Spectroscopy},
  author = {Miriam Garcia and Alexander W. Fullerton and Francisco Najarro and Joachim Puls and Daniel J. Lennon and Jean-Claude Bouret and Christopher J. Evans and Margaret Hanson and Artemio Herrero and D. John Hillier and Alexandre Legault and María del Mar Rubio-Díez and Sergio Simón-Díaz and Jon O. Sundqvist and Frank Tramper},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02667},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in ApJ Letters