English

Probing gravity with a joint analysis of galaxy and CMB lensing and SDSS spectroscopy

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2018-11-16 v2

Abstract

We present measurements of EGE_G, a probe of gravity from large-scale structure, using BOSS LOWZ and CMASS spectroscopic samples, with lensing measurements from SDSS (galaxy lensing) and Planck (CMB lensing). Using SDSS lensing and the BOSS LOWZ sample, we measure EG=0.400.04+0.05\langle{E_G}\rangle=0.40^{+0.05}_{-0.04} (stat), ±0.026\pm 0.026 (systematic), consistent with the predicted value from the Planck Λ\LambdaCDM model, EG=0.46E_G=0.46. Using CMB lensing, we measure EG=0.460.09+0.08\langle{E_G}\rangle=0.46^{+0.08}_{-0.09} (stat) for LOWZ (statistically consistent with galaxy lensing and Planck predictions) and EG=0.390.05+0.05\langle{E_G}\rangle=0.39^{+0.05}_{-0.05} (stat) for the CMASS sample, consistent with the Planck prediction of EG=0.40E_G=0.40 given the higher redshift of the sample. We also study the redshift evolution of EGE_G by splitting the LOWZ sample into two samples based on redshift, with results being consistent with model predictions. We estimate systematic uncertainties on the above EG\langle{E_G}\rangle numbers to be 6\sim 6% (when using galaxy-galaxy lensing) or 3\sim 3% (when using CMB lensing), subdominant to the quoted statistical errors. These systematic error budgets are dominated by observational systematics in galaxy-galaxy lensing and by theoretical modeling uncertainties, respectively. We do not estimate observational systematics in galaxy-CMB lensing cross correlations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1803.08915,
  title  = {Probing gravity with a joint analysis of galaxy and CMB lensing and SDSS spectroscopy},
  author = {Sukhdeep Singh and Shadab Alam and Rachel Mandelbaum and Uros Seljak and Sergio Rodriguez-Torres and Shirley Ho},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08915},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

Matches accepted version in MNRAS