Pro-Cyclicality of Traditional Risk Measurements: Quantifying and Highlighting Factors at its Source
Abstract
Since the introduction of risk-based solvency regulation, pro-cyclicality has been a subject of concerns from all market participants. Here, we lay down a methodology to evaluate the amount of pro-cyclicality in the way finnancial institutions measure risk, and identify factors explaining this pro-cyclical behavior. We introduce a new indicator based on the Sample Quantile Process (SQP, a dynamic generalization of Value-at-Risk), conditioned on realized volatility to quantify the pro-cyclicality, and evaluate its amount in the markets, considering 11 stock indices as realizations of the SQP. Then we determine two main factors explaining the pro-cyclicality: the clustering and return-to-the-mean of volatility, as it could have been anticipated but not quantified before, and, more surprisingly, the very way risk is measured, independently of this return-to-the-mean effect.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1903.03969,
title = {Pro-Cyclicality of Traditional Risk Measurements: Quantifying and Highlighting Factors at its Source},
author = {Marcel Bräutigam and Michel Dacorogna and Marie Kratz},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03969},
year = {2019}
}
Comments
49 pages, 9 figures, 15 tables. Changes to previous version: Restructured the introduction; added missing regression lines in Figures 5 and 7; added an appendix with further material