English

Powers Vs. Powers

Commutative Algebra 2019-03-28 v1

Abstract

Let AB A \subset B be rings. An ideal JB J \subset B is called power stable in AA if JnA=(JA)n J^n \cap A = (J\cap A)^n for all n1 n\geq 1. Further, JJ is called ultimately power stable in AA if JnA=(JA)n J^n \cap A = (J\cap A)^n for all nn large i.e., n0 n \gg 0. In this note, our focus is to study these concepts for pair of rings RR[X] R \subset R[X] where RR is an integral domain. Some of the results we prove are: A maximal ideal m\textbf{m} in R[X]R[X] is power stable in RR if and only if t \wp^t is \wp-primary for all t1 t \geq 1 for the prime ideal =mR\wp = \textbf{m}\cap R. We use this to prove that for a Hilbert domain RR, any radical ideal in R[X]R[X] which is a finite intersection of G-ideals is power stable in RR. Further, we prove that if RR is a Noetherian integral domain of dimension 1 then any radical ideal in R[X]R[X] is power stable in RR, and if every ideal in R[X]R[X] is power stable in RR then RR is a field. We also show that if AB A \subset B are Noetherian rings, and I I is an ideal in BB which is ultimately power stable in AA, then if IA=J I \cap A = J is a radical ideal generated by a regular AA-sequence, it is power stable. Finally, we give a relationship in power stability and ultimate power stability using the concept of reduction of an ideal (Theorem 3.22).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1903.11067,
  title  = {Powers Vs. Powers},
  author = {Pramod K Sharma},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11067},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

21 pages; comments are welcome. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0705.1286

R2 v1 2026-06-23T08:19:57.017Z