Power laws in microrheology experiments on living cells: comparative analysis and modelling
Abstract
We compare and synthesize the results of two microrheological experiments on the cytoskeleton of single cells. In the first one, the creep function J(t) of a cell stretched between two glass plates is measured after applying a constant force step. In the second one, a micrometric bead specifically bound to transmembrane receptors is driven by an oscillating optical trap, and the viscoelastic coefficient is retrieved. Both and exhibit power law behavior: and , with the same exponent . This power law behavior is very robust ; is distributed over a narrow range, and shows almost no dependance on the cell type, on the nature of the protein complex which transmits the mechanical stress, nor on the typical length scale of the experiment. On the contrary, the prefactors and appear very sensitive to these parameters. Whereas the exponents are normally distributed over the cell population, the prefactors and follow a log-normal repartition. These results are compared with other data published in the litterature. We propose a global interpretation, based on a semi-phenomenological model, which involves a broad distribution of relaxation times in the system. The model predicts the power law behavior and the statistical repartition of the mechanical parameters, as experimentally observed for the cells. Moreover, it leads to an estimate of the largest response time in the cytoskeletal network: s.
Cite
@article{arxiv.physics/0603211,
title = {Power laws in microrheology experiments on living cells: comparative analysis and modelling},
author = {Martial Balland and Nicolas Desprat and Delphine Icard and Sophie Fereol and Atef Asnacios and Julien Browaeys and Sylvie Henon and Francois Gallet},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:physics/0603211},
year = {2007}
}
Comments
47 pages, 14 figures // v2: PDF file is now Acrobat Reader 4 (and up) compatible // v3: Minor typos corrected - The presentation of the model have been substantially rewritten (p. 17-18), in order to give more details - Enhanced description of protocols // v4: Minor corrections in the text : the immersion angles are estimated and not measured // v5: Minor typos corrected. Two references were clarified