English

Polynomial Almost-Complex Curves in $\hat{\mathbb{S}}^{2,4}$

Differential Geometry 2024-04-25 v2 Analysis of PDEs

Abstract

For solutions to the g2\mathfrak{g}_2 affine Toda field equations in C\mathbb{C} with respect to \emph{polynomial} holomorphic sextic differential qq, we study the associated almost-complex curves νq:CS^2,4\nu_q: \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \hat{\mathbb{S}}^{2,4}. The asymptotic boundary Δ:=(νq)\Delta := \partial_{\infty}(\nu_q) of νq\nu_q is found to be a polygon in Ein2,3\mathsf{Ein}^{2,3} with degq+6\mathsf{deg} q + 6 vertices. The polygon Δ\Delta satisfies an \emph{annihilator property}, which is related to a G2\mathsf{G}_2'-invariant discrete metric d3:Ein2,3×Ein2,3{0,1,2,3}d_3: \mathsf{Ein}^{2,3} \times \mathsf{Ein}^{2,3} \rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\} on Ein2,3\mathsf{Ein}^{2,3}. In fact, we show G2=Isom(d3)Diff(Ein2,3)\mathsf{G}_2' = \mathsf{Isom}(d_3) \cap \mathsf{Diff}(\mathsf{Ein}^{2,3}). The asymptotic boundary defines a map α:MSkMPk+6\alpha: \mathsf{MS}_{k} \rightarrow \mathsf{MP}_{k+6} between the equidimensional moduli spaces of holomorphic polynomial sextic differentials of degree kk and of annihilator polygons with k+6k+6 vertices and is conjectured to be a homeomorphism onto its image. We also discuss the relationship between νq\nu_q and a related minimal surface fq:CG2/Kf_q: \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathsf{G}_2'/K in the symmetric space G2/K\mathsf{G}_2'/K, showing how to realize their mutual harmonic lift to G2/T\mathsf{G}_2'/T geometrically. Before beginning the geometry, we prove the existence and uniqueness of a complete (real) solution to the g2\mathfrak{g}_2 affine Toda field equations in C\mathbb{C} associated to polynomial qH0(KC6)q \in H^0(\mathcal{K}_\mathbb{C}^6).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2208.14409,
  title  = {Polynomial Almost-Complex Curves in $\hat{\mathbb{S}}^{2,4}$},
  author = {Parker Evans},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.14409},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

The main results and structure are the same, but thorough edits have been implemented for clarity and precision. Most notably -- the proof of Lemma 4.11 in the first version was incorrect, and has been replaced with a different argument, and Conjecture 8.13 (from the old version) was updated slightly

R2 v1 2026-06-28T00:25:37.460Z