English

Polarisation of very-low-mass stars and brown dwarfs

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2015-05-13 v2

Abstract

Ultra-cool dwarfs of the L spectral type (Teff=1400-2200K) are known to have dusty atmospheres. Asymmetries of the dwarf surface may arise from rotationally-induced flattening and dust-cloud coverage, and may result in non-zero linear polarisation through dust scattering. We aim to study the heterogeneity of ultra-cool dwarfs' atmospheres and the grain-size effects on the polarisation degree in a sample of nine late M, L and early T dwarfs. We obtain linear polarimetric imaging measurements using FORS1 at the Very Large Telescope, in the Bessel I filter, and for a subset in the Bessel R and the Gunn z filters. We measure a polarisation degree of (0.31+/-0.06)% for LHS102BC. We fail to detect linear polarisation in the rest of our sample, with upper-limits on the polarisation degree of each object of 0.09% to 0.76% (95% CL). For those targets we do not find evidence of large-scale cloud horizontal structure in our data. Together with previous surveys, our results set the fraction of ultra-cool dwarfs with detected linear polarisation to (30+10-6)% (1-sigma). For three brown dwarfs, our observations indicate polarisation degrees different (at the 3-sigma level) than previously reported, giving hints of possible variations. Our results fail to correlate with the current model predictions for ultra-cool dwarf polarisation for a flattening-induced polarisation, or with the variability studies for a polarisation induced by an hetereneous cloud cover. This stresses the intricacy of each of those tasks, but may as well proceed from complex and dynamic atmospheric processes.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0904.0005,
  title  = {Polarisation of very-low-mass stars and brown dwarfs},
  author = {B. Goldman and J. Pitann and M. R. Zapatero Osorio and C. A. L. Bailer-Jones and V. J. S. Bejar and J. A. Caballero and Th. Henning},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0904.0005},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

8 pages, 2 figures, accepted by A&A. Reference problem and a few typos corrected; improved error treatment of Zapatero Osorio et al (2005) data, leading to minor differences in the results