English

Pluricomplex Green and Lempert functions for equally weighted poles

Complex Variables 2009-11-07 v1

Abstract

For Ω\Omega a domain in Cn\mathbb C^n, the pluricomplex Green function with poles a1,...,aNΩa_1, ...,a_N \in \Omega is defined as G(z):=sup{u(z):uPSH(Ω),u(x)logxaj+Cjwhenxaj,j=1,...,N}G(z):=\sup \{u(z): u\in PSH_-(\Omega), u(x)\le \log \|x-a_j\|+C_j \text{when} x \to a_j, j=1,...,N \}. When there is only one pole, or two poles in the unit ball, it turns out to be equal to the Lempert function defined from analytic disks into Ω\Omega by LS(z):=inf{j=1Nνjlogζj:ϕO(D,Ω),ϕ(0)=z,ϕ(ζj)=aj,j=1,...,N}L_S (z) :=\inf \{\sum^N_{j=1}\nu_j\log|\zeta_j|: \exists \phi\in \mathcal {O}(\mathbb D,\Omega), \phi(0)=z, \phi(\zeta_j)=a_j, j=1,...,N \}. It is known that we always have LS(z)GS(z)L_S (z) \ge G_S(z). In the more general case where we allow weighted poles, there is a counterexample to equality due to Carlehed and Wiegerinck, with Ω\Omega equal to the bidisk. Here we exhibit a counterexample using only four distinct equally weighted poles in the bidisk. In order to do so, we first define a more general notion of Lempert function "with multiplicities", analogous to the generalized Green functions of Lelong and Rashkovskii, then we show how in some examples this can be realized as a limit of regular Lempert functions when the poles tend to each other. Finally, from an example where LS(z)>GS(z)L_S (z) > G_S(z) in the case of multiple poles, we deduce that distinct (but close enough) equally weighted poles will provide an example of the same inequality. Open questions are pointed out about the limits of Green and Lempert functions when poles tend to each other.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0206214,
  title  = {Pluricomplex Green and Lempert functions for equally weighted poles},
  author = {Pascal J. Thomas and Nguyen Van Trao},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0206214},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

25 pages

R2 v1 2026-07-22T16:46:14.781Z