English

Planar arcs

Combinatorics 2018-04-05 v4

Abstract

Let pp denote the characteristic of Fq{\mathbb F}_q, the finite field with qq elements. We prove that if qq is odd then an arc of size q+2tq+2-t in the projective plane over Fq{\mathbb F}_q, which is not contained in a conic, is contained in the intersection of two curves, which do not share a common component, and have degree at most t+plogptt+p^{\lfloor \log_p t \rfloor}, provided a certain technical condition on tt is satisfied. This implies that if qq is odd then an arc of size at least qq+q/p+3q-\sqrt{q}+\sqrt{q}/p+3 is contained in a conic if qq is square and an arc of size at least qq+72q-\sqrt{q}+\frac{7}{2} is contained in a conic if qq is prime. This is of particular interest in the case that qq is an odd square, since then there are examples of arcs, not contained in a conic, of size qq+1q-\sqrt{q}+1, and it has long been conjectured that if q9q \neq 9 is an odd square then any larger arc is contained in a conic. These bounds improve on previously known bounds when qq is an odd square and for primes less than 17831783. The previously known bounds, obtained by Segre \cite{Segre1967}, Hirschfeld and Korchm\'aros \cite{HK1996} \cite{HK1998}, and Voloch \cite{Voloch1990b} \cite{Voloch1991}, rely on results on the number of points on algebraic curves over finite fields, in particular the Hasse-Weil theorem and the St\"ohr-Voloch theorem, and are based on Segre's idea to associate an algebraic curve in the dual plane containing the tangents to an arc. In this paper we do not rely on such theorems, but use a new approach starting from a scaled coordinate-free version of Segre's lemma of tangents. Arcs in the projective plane over Fq{\mathbb F}_q of size qq and q+1q+1, qq odd, were classified by Segre \cite{Segre1955b} in 1955. In this article, we complete the classification of arcs of size q1q-1 and q2q-2.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1705.10940,
  title  = {Planar arcs},
  author = {Simeon Ball and Michel Lavrauw},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10940},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

The error in the differentiation argument has been corrected

R2 v1 2026-06-22T20:04:28.079Z