English

PiCA: Pivot-Based Credit Assignment for Search Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Artificial Intelligence 2026-05-13 v2

Abstract

Large Language Model (LLM)-based search agents trained with reinforcement learning (RL) have significantly improved the performance of knowledge-intensive tasks. However, existing methods encounter critical challenges in long-horizon credit assignment: (i) Reward Sparsity, where models receive only outcome feedback without step-level guidance to differentiate action quality; (ii) Isolated Credit, where credit is assigned to steps independently, failing to capture sequential dependencies; and (iii) Distributional Shift, where rewards are estimated on templates that deviate from the model's natural generative distribution. To address these issues, we propose Pivot-Based Credit Assignment (PiCA), a novel step reward mechanism that reformulates the search trajectory as a sequential process of cumulative search progress. Unlike prior isolated step rewards, PiCA defines process rewards as success probabilities dependent on the historical context based on Potential-Based Reward Shaping (PBRS). This approach identifies pivot steps, which comprise target golden sub-queries and sub-answers derived from historical trajectories, as information peaks that significantly boost the likelihood of a correct final answer. By anchoring these step rewards to the final task objective, PiCA provides dense, pivot-aware and trajectory-dependent guidance while maintaining distributional consistency. Extensive experiments show that PiCA outperforms existing strong baselines across seven knowledge-intensive QA benchmarks, achieving 15.2% and 2.2% improvements for 3B and 7B models. The consistent performance gains across various models show PiCA's robust generalization. The code is available at https://github.com/novdream/PiCA.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2605.09287,
  title  = {PiCA: Pivot-Based Credit Assignment for Search Agentic Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Dongyi Liu and Yifan Niu and Qinwen Wang and Han Xiao and Jia Li},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.09287},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

21 pages, 7 figures

R2 v1 2026-07-01T13:01:08.975Z