English

Photon production from a thermalized quark gluon plasma: quantum kinetics and nonperturbative aspects

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2011-07-19 v3 Nuclear Experiment Nuclear Theory

Abstract

We study the production of photons from a quark gluon plasma in local thermal equilibrium by introducing a non-perturbative formulation of the real time evolution of the density matrix. The main ingredient is the real time effective action for the electromagnetic field to O(αem)\mathcal{O}(\alpha_{em}) and to all orders in αs\alpha_s. The real time evolution is completely determined by the solution of a \emph{classical stochastic} non-local Langevin equation which provides a Dyson-like resummation of the perturbative expansion. The Langevin equation is solved in closed form by Laplace transform in terms of the thermal photon polarization. A quantum kinetic description emerges directly from this formulation. We find that photons with k200 Mevk \lesssim 200 ~{Mev} \emph{thermalize} as plasmon quasiparticles in the plasma on time scales t1020 fm/ct \sim 10-20 ~{fm}/c which is of the order of the lifetime of the QGP expected at RHIC and LHC. We then obtain the direct photon yield to lowest order in αem\alpha_{em} and to leading logarithmic order in αs\alpha_s in a \emph{uniform} expansion valid at all time. The yield during a QGP lifetime t10 fm/ct \sim 10 ~{fm}/c is systematically larger than that obtained with the equilibrium formulation and the spectrum features a distinct flattening for k2.5 Gevk \gtrsim 2.5 ~{Gev}. We discuss the window of reliability of our results, the theoretical uncertainties in \emph{any} treatment of photon emission from a QGP in LTE and the shortcomings of the customary S-matrix approach.

Cite

@article{arxiv.hep-ph/0311156,
  title  = {Photon production from a thermalized quark gluon plasma: quantum kinetics and nonperturbative aspects},
  author = {Daniel Boyanovsky and Hector J. de Vega},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:hep-ph/0311156},
  year   = {2011}
}

Comments

31 pages. To appear in Nucl. Phys. A. New section (VII) with response to and criticism of hep-ph/0312222