English

Photometric Redshift Estimation for Quasars by Integration of KNN and SVM

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics 2016-05-25 v1

Abstract

The massive photometric data collected from multiple large-scale sky surveys offer significant opportunities for measuring distances of celestial objects by photometric redshifts. However, catastrophic failure is still an unsolved problem for a long time and exists in the current photometric redshift estimation approaches (such as kk-nearest-neighbor). In this paper, we propose a novel two-stage approach by integration of kk-nearest-neighbor (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM) methods together. In the first stage, we apply KNN algorithm on photometric data and estimate their corresponding zphot_{\rm phot}. By analysis, we find two dense regions with catastrophic failure, one in the range of zphot[0.3,1.2]_{\rm phot}\in[0.3,1.2], the other in the range of zphot[1.2,2.1]_{\rm phot}\in [1.2,2.1]. In the second stage, we map the photometric input pattern of points falling into the two ranges from original attribute space into a high dimensional feature space by Gaussian kernel function in SVM. In the high dimensional feature space, many outlier points resulting from catastrophic failure by simple Euclidean distance computation in KNN can be identified by a classification hyperplane of SVM and further be corrected. Experimental results based on the SDSS (the Sloan Digital Sky Survey) quasar data show that the two-stage fusion approach can significantly mitigate catastrophic failure and improve the estimation accuracy of photometric redshifts of quasars. The percents in different |Δ\Deltaz| ranges and rms (root mean square) error by the integrated method are 83.47%83.47\%, 89.83%89.83\%, 90.90%90.90\% and 0.192, respectively, compared to the results by KNN (71.96%71.96\%, 83.78%83.78\%, 89.73%89.73\% and 0.204).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1601.01739,
  title  = {Photometric Redshift Estimation for Quasars by Integration of KNN and SVM},
  author = {Bo Han and Hongpeng Ding and Yanxia Zhang and Yongheng Zhao},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.01739},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

14 pages, 7 figures, 1 table, accepted by Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics