English

Percolation thresholds for photonic quantum computing

Quantum Physics 2017-01-16 v1

Abstract

Any quantum algorithm can be implemented by an adaptive sequence of single node measurements on an entangled cluster of qubits in a square lattice topology. Photons are a promising candidate for encoding qubits but assembling a photonic entangled cluster with linear optical elements relies on probabilistic operations. Given a supply of nn-photon-entangled microclusters, using a linear optical circuit and photon detectors, one can assemble a random entangled state of photons that can be subsequently "renormalized" into a logical cluster for universal quantum computing. In this paper, we prove that there is a fundamental tradeoff between nn and the minimum success probability λc(n)\lambda_c^{(n)} that each two-photon linear-optical fusion operation must have, in order to guarantee that the resulting state can be renormalized: λc(n)1/(n1)\lambda_c^{(n)} \ge 1/(n-1). We present a new way of formulating this problem where λc(n)\lambda_c^{(n)} is the bond percolation threshold of a logical graph and provide explicit constructions to produce a percolated cluster using n=3n=3 photon microclusters (GHZ states) as the initial resource. We settle a heretofore open question by showing that a renormalizable cluster can be created with 33-photon microclusters over a 2D graph without feedforward, which makes the scheme extremely attractive for an integrated-photonic realization. We also provide lattice constructions, which show that 0.5λc(3)0.58980.5 \le \lambda_c^{(3)} \le 0.5898, improving on a recent result of λc(3)0.625\lambda_c^{(3)} \le 0.625. Finally, we discuss how losses affect the bounds on the threshold, using loss models inspired by a recently-proposed method to produce photonic microclusters using quantum dot emitters.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1701.03775,
  title  = {Percolation thresholds for photonic quantum computing},
  author = {Mihir Pant and Don Towsley and Dirk Englund and Saikat Guha},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.03775},
  year   = {2017}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T17:49:50.641Z