Parkes Pulsar Timing Array constraints on ultralight scalar-field dark matter
Abstract
It is widely accepted that dark matter contributes about a quarter of the critical mass-energy density in our Universe. The nature of dark matter is currently unknown, with the mass of possible constituents spanning nearly one hundred orders of magnitude. The ultralight scalar field dark matter, consisting of extremely light bosons with eV and often called "fuzzy" dark matter, provides intriguing solutions to some challenges at sub-Galactic scales for the standard cold dark matter model. As shown by Khmelnitsky and Rubakov, such a scalar field in the Galaxy would produce an oscillating gravitational potential with nanohertz frequencies, resulting in periodic variations in the times of arrival of radio pulses from pulsars. The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA) has been monitoring 20 millisecond pulsars at two to three weeks intervals for more than a decade. In addition to the detection of nanohertz gravitational waves, PPTA offers the opportunity for direct searches for fuzzy dark matter in an astrophysically feasible range of masses. We analyze the latest PPTA data set which includes timing observations for 26 pulsars made between 2004 and 2016. We perform a search in this data set for evidence of ultralight dark matter in the Galaxy using Bayesian and Frequentist methods. No statistically significant detection has been made. We therefore place upper limits on the local dark matter density. Our limits, improving on previous searches by a factor of two to five, constrain the dark matter density of ultralight bosons with eV to be below with 95\% confidence in the Earth neighborhood. Finally, we discuss the prospect of probing the astrophysically favored mass range eV with next-generation pulsar timing facilities.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1810.03227,
title = {Parkes Pulsar Timing Array constraints on ultralight scalar-field dark matter},
author = {Nataliya K. Porayko and Xingjiang Zhu and Yuri Levin and Lam Hui and George Hobbs and Aleksandra Grudskaya and Konstantin Postnov and Matthew Bailes and N. D. Ramesh Bhat and William Coles and Shi Dai and James Dempsey and Michael J. Keith and Matthew Kerr and Michael Kramer and Paul D. Lasky and Richard N. Manchester and Stefan Osłowski and Aditya Parthasarathy and Vikram Ravi and Daniel J. Reardon and Pablo A. Rosado and Christopher J. Russell and Ryan M. Shannon and Renée Spiewak and Willem van Straten and Lawrence Toomey and Jingbo Wang and Linqing Wen and Xiaopeng You},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.03227},
year = {2019}
}
Comments
Fixed a typo in Fig. 5; Published in Phys. Rev. D as Editor's Suggestion article, 17 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables