English

Pareto optimal structures producing resonances of minimal decay under $L^1$-type constraints

Optimization and Control 2014-06-23 v2 Mathematical Physics math.MP Spectral Theory Optics

Abstract

Optimization of resonances associated with 1-D wave equations in inhomogeneous media is studied under the constraint B1<=m\| B \|_1 <= m on the nonnegative function BL1(0,)B \in L^1 (0,\ell) that represents the medium's structure. From the Physics and Optimization points of view, it convenient to generalize the problem replacing BB by a nonnegative measure dMd M and imposing on dMd M the condition that its total mass is <=m<= m. The problem is to design for a given frequency αR\alpha \in R a medium that generates a resonance ω \omega on the line α+iR\alpha + i R with a minimal possible decay rate Imω| Im \omega |. Such resonances are said to be of minimal decay and form a Pareto frontier. We show that corresponding optimal measures consist of finite number of point masses, and that this result yields non-existence of optimizers for the problem over the set of absolutely continuous measures B(x)dxB(x) dx. Then we derive restrictions on optimal point masses and their positions. These restrictions are strong enough to calculate optimal dMd M if the optimal resonance ω \omega , the first point mass m1m_1, and one more geometric parameter are known. This reduces the original infinitely-dimensional problem to optimization over four real parameters. For small frequencies, we explicitly find the Pareto set and the corresponding optimal measures dMd M. The technique of the paper is based on the two-parameter perturbation method and the notion of local boundary point. The latter is introduced as a generalization of local extrema to vector optimization problems.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1308.1943,
  title  = {Pareto optimal structures producing resonances of minimal decay under $L^1$-type constraints},
  author = {Illya M. Karabash},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.1943},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

38 pages, the proof of Lemma 5.4 is corrected, typos are corrected