English

Parameterised and Fine-grained Subgraph Counting, modulo $2$

Computational Complexity 2023-10-12 v2 Discrete Mathematics

Abstract

Given a class of graphs H\mathcal{H}, the problem Sub(H)\oplus\mathsf{Sub}(\mathcal{H}) is defined as follows. The input is a graph HHH\in \mathcal{H} together with an arbitrary graph GG. The problem is to compute, modulo 22, the number of subgraphs of GG that are isomorphic to HH. The goal of this research is to determine for which classes H\mathcal{H} the problem Sub(H)\oplus\mathsf{Sub}(\mathcal{H}) is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT), i.e., solvable in time f(H)GO(1)f(|H|)\cdot |G|^{O(1)}. Curticapean, Dell, and Husfeldt (ESA 2021) conjectured that Sub(H)\oplus\mathsf{Sub}(\mathcal{H}) is FPT if and only if the class of allowed patterns H\mathcal{H} is "matching splittable", which means that for some fixed BB, every HHH \in \mathcal{H} can be turned into a matching (a graph in which every vertex has degree at most 11) by removing at most BB vertices. Assuming the randomised Exponential Time Hypothesis, we prove their conjecture for (I) all hereditary pattern classes H\mathcal{H}, and (II) all tree pattern classes, i.e., all classes H\mathcal{H} such that every HHH\in \mathcal{H} is a tree. We also establish almost tight fine-grained upper and lower bounds for the case of hereditary patterns (I).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2301.01696,
  title  = {Parameterised and Fine-grained Subgraph Counting, modulo $2$},
  author = {Leslie Ann Goldberg and Marc Roth},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.01696},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

57 pages, 19 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-28T08:02:45.332Z