English

Packing, tiling, orthogonality and completeness

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2007-05-23 v2 Metric Geometry

Abstract

Let ΩRd\Omega \subseteq {\bf R}^d be an open set of measure 1. An open set DRdD \subseteq {\bf R}^d is called a ``tight orthogonal packing region'' for Ω\Omega if DDD-D does not intersect the zeros of the Fourier Transform of the indicator function of Ω\Omega and DD has measure 1. Suppose that Λ\Lambda is a discrete subset of Rd{\bf R}^d. The main contribution of this paper is a new way of proving the following result (proved by different methods by Lagarias, Reeds and Wang and, in the case of Ω\Omega being the cube, by Iosevich and Pedersen: DD tiles Rd{\bf R}^d when translated at the locations Λ\Lambda if and only if the set of exponentials EΛ={exp2πiλx:λΛ}E_\Lambda = \{\exp 2\pi i \lambda\cdot x: \lambda\in\Lambda\} is an orthonormal basis for L2(Ω)L^2(\Omega). (When Ω\Omega is the unit cube in Rd{\bf R}^d then it is a tight orthogonal packing region of itself.) In our approach orthogonality of EΛE_\Lambda is viewed as a statement about ``packing'' Rd{\bf R}^d with translates of a certain nonnegative function and, additionally, we have completeness of EΛE_\Lambda in L2(Ω)L^2(\Omega) if and only if the above-mentioned packing is in fact a tiling. We then formulate the tiling condition in Fourier Analytic language and use this to prove our result.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/9904066,
  title  = {Packing, tiling, orthogonality and completeness},
  author = {Mihail N. Kolountzakis},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/9904066},
  year   = {2007}
}